Sins of JNU : Anti-India, Anti-Hindu lunatic
Leftists-Mullah institution



1.Kargil war the JNU students Union
romance with Pakistanis

Source : intellibriefs.blogspot.com/2005/05/kargil-war-jnu-students-union.html

In 1999, right in the middle of the Kargil war the JNU students Union arranged
an Indo-Pak Mushaira. Three brothers Major K.K.Sharma, Major L.K.Sharma -- and
Dr Sharad Sharma asked and received admission to the event so that they may
witness the perspectives of the "honored" Pakistani guests.

As the event proceeded at 10 PM, the three were at first shocked and then grew
increasingly outraged at the outright India-bashing that was taking place in
their presence, but even though they were seething at all the anti-national
rhetoric, these gentlemen kept a tight leash on their tempers in the interests
of free speech. About an hour later, it was the turn of poetess Fahmida Riyaz,
from Pakistan who began her recital with an insulting barrage of verses about
how India's decision to go nuclear was the result of a "fundamentalist and
self-destructive" policy .

This was a little too much to stomach for the Sharma brothers, who had seen
plenty of their brave and courageous friends and relatives being butchered to
smithereens in Kargil by the barbarous Jihad brigades of Islamic Pakistan. Ms.
Riyaz had not a word to say about the culpability of her own beloved Pakistan in
this regard. To hear Ms. Riaz characterizing India as "Fundamentalist and
evil" by a woman from the very country which repeatedly thrusts brutal
aggression on India in the name of Allah, was just too much to bear for these
patriotic fellows. They began booing and chanting "Bharat Mata Ki Jai"

What happened next however is a shocking testament to the depravity and
anti-nationalism which is being bred in the JNU environment. Instead of joining
in and taking offense at this insult to India, the JNU students instead turned
upon the Sharma brothers and began beating up the very Army men who have
sacrificed their all to defend India and the freedom that Indian democracy
represents. In a desperate attempt to defend themselves, one of the Majors took
out his pistol and fired a warning shot into the air. Some of the onlookers
later admitted that the Pakistani poets on stage were cursing and insulting the
three brave brothers in the most derogatory and obscene language. Some even
mocked them saying that they were "Hindu Hijras". The Sharma brothers
even as they were being attacked by the mob, had the guts to answer back and
remind the Pakistanis about exactly which side acted like Hijras during Kargil.

2. Arunachal Pradesh is not part of
India , JNU Students Union resolution , NSUI leader angry over secular left pals

Source : intellibriefs.blogspot.com/2004/12/wake-up-call-to-indians-on-leftists.html
Originally published : Pioneer

For the Left outfits the Communist camaraderie comes before the interest of the
nation. If a resolution, which was defeated in the students' council of the
Jawaharlal Nehru University, is anything to go by -- the Communists of the world
must unite. Unbelievable it may sound, at the first council meeting of JNU
Students Union (JNUSU), the Left outfits voted against a resolution condemning
China for repeatedly showing Arunachal Pradesh as not part of India.Zinniah and
Manoj, councilors of the National Students Union of India (NSUI), student wing
of the Congress, had brought the resolution.

The resolution was defeated by 11 votes, as most of the councilors from Left
outfits, namely, Students Federation of India (SFI) and All India Students
Federation (AISF) voted against the resolution.The one line resolution reads:
"The council condemns the Republic China for continuing to show Arunachal
Pradesh as part of its territory." In all, the council discussed 33 items
on agenda. The resolutionon Arunachal Pradesh was the eighth item on the list.
"Instead of taking a strong note of China's inconsistent policy towards
Arunachal Pradesh, SFI and AISF showed the softness as if Arunachal Pradesh is
not India's part," Madhumita Chakraborty, JNU unit NSUI president,
said."SFI, AISF and AISA representatives voted against the motion, thereby
verifying that they actually support the Chinese claim of Arunachal Pradesh
being a part of Chinese territory.

Their voting against the motion is a betrayal of the very Constitution of our
country and has exposed the anti-national character of the Left," she
added.SFI is the student wing of Communist Party of India (Marxist), a major
constituent of the United Progressive Alliance (UPA), AISF of Communist Party of
India (CPI), another Left constituent of the UPA, while All India Students
Association (AISA) is the student outfit of CPI-Marxist and Leninst. AISA's Mona
Das heads the JNUSU."Arunachal Pradesh is very much a part of
Indianterritory, and the people of Arunachal Pradesh have affirmed the
pan-Indian character of the Congress by giving it a positive mandate in the
recently held assembly elections in the state, rejecting all separatist and
isolationist forces," Ms Madhumita Chakraborty added.

Taking strong note of the SFI-AISF-AISA's stand on Arunachal Pradesh,
NSUI president said: "People know the Left's history of
betrayals. NSUI will not tolerate even an inch of Indian land being claimed by
our neighbouring countries, while striving all the time for better relations
with them, a fact highlighted by Dr Manmohan Singh's recent participation in the
ASEAN summit.""Who can forget the stand of the Left in the 1962 war
with China, when they openly supported the Chinese aggression by stating that
the war was over a piece of land that India claims to be India's and China
claims to be China's. Left outfits owe an explanation to the whole nation for
such a blatant anti-national stand," Ms Chakraborty added.TheLeft
resolution, which was passed by majority, stated: "The council urges the
governments of India and People's Republic of China to speed up the talks
between the two countries on various issues including the border talks. This
council believes that both the countries need to respect the sovereignty and
integrity of each other and all kinds of xenophobic opinion on both sides need
to be isolated."