Secularism Extra-Ordinary


A Hindu in Hindustan must ask, why a single Hindu will be killed, why a single Hindu woman will be raped, why a single Hindu household be destroyed, why a Hindu place of worship will be desecrated, why a Hindu will be forced to become a refugee in his own land of birth, why a Hindu will be forced to be converted to a barbarian and sectarian faith and has to hide from place to place from the wrath of Islam in Hindustan Why? WHY?


The secularism (!) in India as practised by our leaders is to be studied carefully keeping in mind the ‘Teachings in Islam’: Islam is the only right religion on the earth; all other religions are wrong, as such, non-Muslims are on the path of error.


2. It is the prime religious duty of every Muslim to convert every non-Muslim to Islam.


This effort has to be continuous and non-stop. This continuous non-stop effort is variously called as “Road to Behest”, “Muslim struggle for Peace and Justice”, “Jehad” and so on.


3.There are three stages of thus bringing peace and justice on this earth;


(i) Advice and inducement to non-Muslims to get converted to Islam, or at least to work for and under Islam.


(ii) Creating psychological demoralisation and confusion in the minds of non-Muslims.


(iii) Military attack on non-Muslims.


The historian Zia Barani describing a court scence of Alladdin Khilji with Qazi Mughisuddin says, “They (the Hindus) are called payers of tribute, and when the revenue officer demands silver from them they should without question and with all humility and respect, tender gold.... to keep the Hindus in abasement is specially a religious duty, because the prophet has commanded us to slay them, plunder them, and make them captive, saying convert them to Islam or kill them, enslave them and spoil their wealth and property...” (Zia Barani-Tarikh-Firoz Shahi vol 3; page 184).


The prophet said, “Gabriel came to me and gave me tidings: verily who died amongst your Ummat (followers) without associating anything with Allah would enter paradise.” Abu Zarr asked whether it was true even if the man committed adultery and theft?”. The prophet replied, “Yes, even if he committed adultery and theft”.


Mohammad Ali, the Khilafat leader, said, “However pure Mr. Gandhi’s character may be, he must appear to me, from the point of view of religion, inferior to any Mussalman even though he be without character ... yes! According to my religion and creed I do hold an adulterer and felon Mussalman to be better than Gandhi”.


*G.H. Jensen (Militant Islam; p 112): “...In redeeming, controlling and changing their education system in specifically Islamic direction amount to be greatest single achievement of militant Islam to date. A massive achievement it is, of long lasting import. If it has not been recognised as an aspect of militant Islam, this is only because it has been going on in separate countries over a space of years in inconspicuous shoolrooms and ministries of education. But this Islamisation of minds (and perhaps the hearts) of hundreds of millions (all over the world) of young Muslims is more truly militant and Islamic than the chopping off of hands”.


Prof. Mushirul Huq (Islam in secular India-p 52): “The ulema has undoubtedly considerable influence through the institutions of Madrasah and Fatwa over Muslim public opinion; they can canalize it in whatever direction they will”.


* Maulana Abdul Hasan Ali Nadvi quoted by Mushirul Huq: (Islam in secular India): “Your reading table is not the table of a public library. This is a madrasah table ... No book is to be found in our shelves, the reading of which makes a man mentally disturbed for weeks. No book should be read which creates doubt against those cherished ideals which are the foundation of our madrasas”.


* Abdul Hasan Ali Nadvi : (The new menace and its answer p. 21) “A powerful Emperor like Akbar had resolved, so it did seem to all intents and purposes, to cast the subcontinent in the mould of paganism in opposition to Islam after it had remained for four hundred years under the benign shadow of Muslim Rule. (In rule of Ghazni, Ghori, Khiljis and Babar etc.)- Each successor of Akbar proved to be better than his predecessor till there came Aurangzeb on the throne whose reign constitutes a most glorious chapter in the annals of Islam and religious renovations. History, as you know, is always ready to repeat itself- it never tries to the process- the only thing is that there may be some force strong enough to turn its tide, and the only force which can bring back the golden era of Islam is the earnestness, the sagacity and the missionary zeal...”.


Note: The Mussalmans and Jews of Medina formed a Nation in the time of prophet Mohammad. It did not last. Within two or three years this alliance fell apart. The Mussalmans deported some Jews and killed the rest”.


Maulana Maududi (founder of Jamaat-e-Islami said in April 1939): “Islam and Nationalism are opposed to each other in spirit and objectives. Islam cannot flourish where Nationalism is and Nationalism has no place in Islam. Promotion of Nationalism means the end of Islam’s progress, and Islam aims at destruction of Nationalism.”


Obviously, one can belong to only one of the two. “Maulana Maududi’s Islam is thus fundamentally opposed to the Constitution of India” (P S Yog- National Integration and Muslim minority. p8).


* M.K. Gandhi observe, 1. My own experience but confirms the opinion that the Mussalman as a rule is a bully and the Hindu as a rule is a coward.


2. In so far as the charge is correct, the Mussalmans take less interest because they do not yet regard India as their home of which they must feel proud. Many regard themselves, quite wrongly I think, as belonging to a race of conquerors” (Young India Apr 2, 1925)


The member of Islam-Jamaat, whose other name is Ummat-e-muslimeen, as soon as it comes into existence, start Jihad, to make efforts to extinguish the un-Islamic rule and to establish in its place a rule which is best described by the Koranic word Kalimutullah, i.e., establishment of Islamic Government and domination of Islam over other faiths”


The other school of progressive Muslims Jamait-e-Ulema chair Maulana Hussain Ahmed Madni (1940 session) observes, “it is most important to establish firmly an Islamic Government. The Jamaat-e-Ulemah has always strived towards this end. But alas! The real objective was not possible of achievement. Therefore the Jamaat co-operated with the Hindus in the struggle for Independence. Although independence thus achieved will not result in Islamic rule, but this will pave the way for the ultimate achievement of our true objective.


India is a Darul-Harb (Enemy country) from the day Muslim rule ended here” (Letter no 64 dated 1.11.1950). Again, “Till Islamic rule is established, it is the duty of the Mussalmans to continue to struggle to that end” (Letter dated 27.1.1972)


* F K Khan Durrani (Meaning of Pakistan): “The creating of Pakistan was necessary as a base for conquering the rest of India”.


Abul Kalam Azad ‘a country like India, which has once been under the Muslim Rule, must be conquered back to Islam’. Evidently, contrary to common conviction, Azad is no exception to subscribers to this idea; this is the voice of most of the Muslim leaders in their idea of converting India to Islam by tenets of their sectarian faith.


* M.C. Chagla (Rose in December): “But one grievance, about which I feel deeply, arose from the indifference shown by the Congress, and even Mahatma Gandhi to the Muslim nationalists. Jinnah and his communal followings seemed all important - we counted for nothing” (Page 100).


“I have, therefore, often strongly disagreed with the Government policy of constantly harping upon minorities, minority status and minority rights. It comes in the way of national unity and emphasises the differences between the majority community and the minority. Of course, it may serve well as a vote catching device to win Muslim votes, but I do not believe in sacrificing national interests in order to get temporary party benefits such as getting a few more seats in certain constituencies” (page 84).


“I am horrified to find that in my country, while monogamy has been made the law for the Hindus, Muslims can still indulge in the luxury of polygamy. It is an insult to womanhood, and the Muslim women, I knew, resent this discrimination between Muslim women and Hindu women” (page 86)


FUNDAMENTALIST CONFERENCE PLEDGES Gobal Islamic Dominance (Organiser, 25.9.1994): A call to liberate all Muslim lands, including Kashmir and Israel from “Coffer Occupation” received frenzied foot-stamping applause from over 8,000 Muslims attending conference organised on August 7, in London by fundamentalist student group Hizb-ul-Tahrir.


The controversial gathering at Wembley Arena was addressed by several radical leaders from the Islamic world, all of whom demanded the immediate establishment of a global Islamic state and the restoration of the caliphate which was abolished after the First World War. A report on the proceedings of the conference in GUJARAT SAMACHAR (August 12, 1994) pointed out that such ambitions are outlawed in many Muslim countries which regard them as subversive.


One speaker from Jordan called for jihad or Holy War: “In order to create our system, you have to take some systems out. Islam will not co-exist with democracy. It is a supreme system to dominate over all other religions.”


The crowd’s, the majority of whom were youths, born and brought up in Britain, response to such statements, was at times near hysterical.


The London conference believed to be the biggest gathering of Islamic extremists staged outside the Middle East has been regarded by many observers as throwing down the gauntlet to the western powers. At the end of the conference the organisers declared a series of resolutions which included the statement, “All international organisations such as the UN, the Security Council and the World Bank (may Allah curse them) are tools of the imperialists and hence are unacceptable to Muslims. We do not recognise any UN resolution”.


After a press conference, Farid Kassim, spokesperson for Hirb-ul-Tahrir, speaking exclusively to GUJARAT SAMACHAR/ ASIAN VOICE said, he believed India to be essentially Muslim land. ‘I hope that one day India will come under Muslim control.’ *Rohit Ambekar, Zonal Co-ordinator of the National Hindu Students Forum (U.K.) said that Hindu students were becoming increasingly agitated at the disruptive and aggressive conduct of Hizb-ul-tahrir... It is about time some positive steps are taken before any untoward incident happens’.


Since Bangladesh has been declared as Islamic Republic, use of force to convert the Hindus is sanctioned by the hierarchy in gross violation of human rights.


It is a routine affair in villages in Bangladesh to present some newly converts to Islam in open meetings and feasts and then boasting that they have now found the true path and abandoned the wrong path of Hinduism. These converts are forcibly dictated to declare vociferously that the Hindu faith contained so many ills and evils and as such they had converted to Islam. These are witnessed in the very heart of Hindustan in open meetings and celebrations. No one is objecting to this anti-secular trend of conversion to a sectarian philosophy which is antagonistic to Hindu philosophy of universal mankind and eating away the very fabric of the Hindu culture, heritage and dharma. There is no machinery or movement amongst the Hindus to put an end to this regressive trend. The facts what we must know are the secrets about conversions to Islam: The Hindu and Sikh girls, including the members of the Hindu and Sikh families who had to flee under the cover of darkness leaving behind their ancestral homes and kith and kin killed by the Muslim Zealots in Pakistan and Bangladesh, are still haunted by these perpetrators of crime with extra zeal in foreign lands; I am quoting an intimate observation of a compatriot of mine explaining the truth about conversion:


‘Islam is a totally missionary religion committed to making everyone a Muslim. According to the Koran the world is divided into 2 parts; Dar-al-salaam (Household of faith), a title which applies to all Islamic countries and Dar-al-Harb (Household of War-land not yet surrendered to Allah) which is the rest of the world. It is the duty of every Muslim to wage Jihad (holy war) against the Kafirs, infidels and unbelievers (what the Koran calls non-Muslims) and force them to submit to Islam. Violence against Kafirs is encouraged in the Koran, if gentle persuasion fails.


Conversion of Sikh and Hindu men is becoming an increasing problem, with hundreds of reported and verified conversions in the last few years. Dozens of cases were reported in October, 1995 alone, when the new academic year started at colleges and universities.


Though Hindu and Sikh girls are more vulnerable to conversion, a large number of Hindu and Sikh boys have also been converted. Universities of London, Bradford, and Luton are the main problem areas.


At the Hirb-ul-Tahrir (HuT) conference at the Wembley arena in August 1994, a Sikh girl was converted on stage in front of 8,000 cheering and clapping Muslims. The Sikh girl then proceeded to attack Sikhism making particularly offensive statement against Sikh Gurus. The audience laughed and continued to cheer. Some of the speech was televised on satellite TV and on the HuT’s pirate radio station. The Muslim leaders in the conference called for an intensification of the campaign to bring Hindu and Sikh women to Islam. The same thing happened in the HuT’s ‘Rally for Islam’ conference in Trafalgar Square, in August 1995. This time, 2 Hindu women were converted on stage in front of 2,000 cheering Muslims. Again, the Muslim leaders demanded that Muslim boys try harder to convert Sikh girls.


The self-appointed Muslim Parliament of Britain passed a resolution demanding that the British government makes it illegal for Muslim women to marry non-Muslims. It also called for the banning of conversion of Muslims to other faiths. Any Muslim who did convert was to be stoned to death according to Islamic tradition... thankfully, the British government did not take the demand seriously. But the events showed the Muslim’s double standard and hypocrisy.


HuT leaders issued a directive in January 1995 to a group of specially selected male members telling them to place Ads in Personal column of Asian Newspapers inviting relationship with Asian women. They were told to write that the religion and nationality of the girl were unimportant and be ambiguous about their own background by, for example, only describing themselves as Asians. They were further told to form intimate relationships with only Sikh and Hindu girls who replied with the aim of conversion. The expense of the Ads and any Dates was to be paid by the HuT.


Certain Muslims have taken to wearing Karas (Sikh steel bracelets) at Bhangra gigs, with the aim of specifically seeking to meet Hindu and Sikh girls. When meeting the girls, these people identify themselves in such a way that the girls do not realise that they were Muslims, for example, by shortening the name as Mohan. They then form a relationship with the girls and begin the slow path to conversion.


A Muslim, when converting somebody, will never tell the person the whole story. For example, when converting men, they always leave out the part about having to get circumcised to become a Muslim. Likewise, the girl converts are tricked into believing that men and women are equal in Islam. They are not told that rape victims, according to Koran, have to produce 4 Male adult witnesses of good character to say that they were raped or they will be charged with adultery and stoned according to Islamic tradition (Hundreds of cases where this has occurred are on file with Amnesty International). Also, according to Koran, all that a Man has to do to divorce his wife is to say” Talaq ‘three times. For women, of course, getting a divorce is much harder. Besides which woman wants to share her husband with three other women. Naturally the would be converts are kept in the dark on such Vital doctrines. HuT leadership has instructed its members to specifically target ‘problem groups’ for conversion. These include young teenage girls, people with social problems, the recently bereaved and victims of abuse as children. These people are considered to be weak willed and so easily manipulated. Once identified, the Muslims will try to convince their target that Islam will magically solve all their problems. Incidentally, in 1992, the HuT produced an article telling Muslim men to particularly target “non-Muslim girls with plain or unattractive physical facial or body features”. These girls, the article said, would not be accustomed to attention and would do anything to maintain any relationship. It went on to say that the ‘discomfort you may feel in such a relationship, especially if intimate, is only temporary however the rewards you will receive in Heaven will rest for eternity’.


The HuT has instructed the Muslims to work in groups when converting, with one person forming a very close friendship with their target. The group then works to find out the strengths and weakness of the person involved and then will work accordingly. If, for example, the person loves sports and is very athletic, they will go on talking about how Islam actively encourages sports and the world’s best sportsmen such as Mohammed Ali, Tyson and Imran Khan are Muslims. If the person has strongly anti-white attitude, they will stir up racial hatred against white even more by talking about past white injustices against them. This policy has been used effectively with Afro-Caribbean’s, with whom they talk about the slave trade and give Malcolm X as a role model (Muslim groups leafleted black cinema audiences watching Malcolm X when It was released). Similarly, hard up students have been offered well, paid jobs with Muslim businesses, provided they convert. Forced conversions are rampant. There have been many documentary cases when Sikh and Hindu girls have been taken to Pakistan by their Muslim boyfriends and forcibly converted. ‘Those resisting are passed to the other Muslim men who keep the girls under lock and key, in some remote village without telephones. All the girls money and passport are taken away. Other cases have occurred when Sikh and Hindu girls are photographed naked by their Muslim boyfriends, who tell the girls to convert or the photos will be published in magazines and sent to the girl’s family and friends. These are tragically not scare stories but actual facts’.


No Hindus ask, why there is no reversion from Islam forcibly imposed on them, forget about conversion from Islam, to the Hindu faith of Universal brotherhood of mankind from sectarian Islamic faith after realising their mistakes or to extricate themselves from the narrowness of sectarianism. A close study of Islam, its practive and interpretations by the Maulanas, will speak for itself. *Maulana Abdul Bari: (Satya Ketu-Arya Samaj ka Itihas.pt4, page 709) ‘We can live in peace with snakes and scorpions but not those who convert from Islam or help such conversions ‘when Swami Shraddhananda started the Shuddhi and sangathan movement.


Inducement through money, promise of power, and offering luxuries to which men are likely to fall prey are to be employed judiciously. Leading and influential men and women of non-Muslim communities are to be targeted with high priority. Understandably, who could be more vulnerable than our corrupt leaders and the media who can very easily be persuaded to sell their Mothers, sisters and daughters for money? National interest and national security are of no concern for the pigmies of leaders in India today. They are all after immediate personal benefit and vote banks only to help them cling to power at any cost. They are just serving the cause of Islam-a barbaric sectarian faith antagonistic to the great Hindu philosophy of Universal Brotherhood of mankind. When the census figures of 1981 were published, all the national papers in London had the caption ‘India reduces her population by 10 million’. Of course, it is a great news when the problem of population explosion is not a regional but a global problem. The analyses had, however, revealed an interesting and reactionary factor. Although the Hindu population was reduced by 30 millions, through family planning, the Muslims in India were after population drive to exceed their target by extra 20 millions thus achieving an aggregate reduction by 10 millions only instead of 33 millions! This disparity in the number games is an encouraging factor for the Islamic aspirants that Muslim population explosion in geometrical progression will eventually bring home an advantage to subjugate the Hindus and thus establish an Al-Islam in India. A meeting of world Muslim leaders was held at the Islamic Cultural Centre and with much enthusiasm resolved to expedite Islamisation of India at any cost and resolved to assist in every way a master programme therefor.


The target was the year 2000 AD and the Muslim states were prepared to contribute more than 1,000 crores of rupees a year for the purpose. The Muslims in India, who had already forfeited their rights to stay in India after partition of the mother country in 1947 and already holding 10 per cent of extra land earmarked for the Muslims in India, who did not move out to Pakistan, were now found in new vigour to establish new mosques, madrassas, Urdu Universities and sectarian Islamic Institutions with the help of the corrupt Indian pseudo-secular leaders thus destroying the harmonious compatriotic relations in the society.


Indian leaders are overtly so corrupt and vulnerable that one Muslim Dr. Ahmed Totenji of Riyadh University in a speech at Gorakhpur organised by the Jamaet-E-Islam on 17 September 1982 openly advised the Muslims to create pressure on the Hindu leaders to work for Islamisation of India.


He blatantly said, ‘the so-called secular parties of India have no principles and there is nothing on earth they are not prepared to do in order to achieve some personal gains. The Indian leaders, Newspapers, and the pseudo secular parties were paid 250 crores of rupees for the purpose. The has already yielded encouraging result. They will always be fighting against the Hindu organisations from now on. Whenever the Muslim population will reach about 20 or 25 crores, we can easily wipe out these Hindu Organisations. Remember the way we had taken help and assistance from the communists in Iran and even from Russia to drive away the Shah and then wiped out the communists. We did the same in Indonesia. There is no reason that India can be any exception. Mind you, only 15 per cent of Muslims had fought against 85 per cent Hindus to found Pakistan. So I see no problem whatsoever for 30 per cent Muslims to wipe out these so-called Nationalist or pseudo-secular parties to establish an Islamic state in India.”


S. K. Ghosh, Director of Law Research Institute, Calcutta analyses the problem of Communal riots clearly as such.’ The alienation is the root of the riots. Muslim leaders do not face the question why riots almost always start with attack on Hindus. When they find more Muslims being arrested they think that enough proof of their victimisation even if they start the trouble, they attack other communities and police parties, desecrate temples, resort to planned conversion of Hindus to Islam, sponsors demonstrations to pressure government to declare Urdu as second language in States etc. They do not explain why Hindu temples were attacked in Hyderabad after some people occupied the Al Aqsa mosque; why the Jagannath temple at Jamnagar in Gujarat was raided after the Israelis bombed the mosque; why Aligarh Muslim University should declare a holiday when the Indian cricket team lost to the Pakistan cricket team in the test mach in Pakistan; why should Muslims exhibit pro-Pakistani behaviour during the cricket test between India and Pakistan in Bangalore; why the Ashram of saint prabhudatt Brahmachari of Jhusi (Allahabad) was ransacked on October 28, 1982, the Muharam day, by the Muslim Processionists; why Indian cricketers should be stoned and booed as ‘Indian Dogs’ and West Indies players glorified by Muslim spectators at the time of One-day cricket test in Srinagar; why should Muslims in Ahmedabad take umbrage if people celebrated the Prudential Cup victory? It can well be asked why riots take place in areas where Muslims are in a substantial majority for example, Agra, Aligarh, Bareilly, Baroda, Bihar Sharif, Bombay, Calcutta, Delhi, Jamshedpur, Meerut, Moradabad, Hyderabad, etc?” The Ministers and officers holding high offices in India can go scot-free, no matter in what degree they are involved in criminal and anti-national activities, showing no respect for the Constitution (one must ask, what happened to the solemn oath of allegiance while accepting offices) or the ancient heritage of the motherland, just be nomenclature of fundamental minority under the peculiar secular system practised by the Government of India.


The other day, Kerala’s Muslim minister Kunhalikutty had the audacity to openly demonstrate his disrespect to the age-old Indian tradition of ‘lighting a lamp’ in an inaugural ceremony of school of music. He called ‘lighting a lamp’ an un-Islamic act and refused to light the lamp. The minister was rightly reminded by the illustrious musician Jesudas, ‘he was there as a minister to represent the Indian community and not as a representative of Islamic community. ‘These leaders in high offices, supposed to command confidence in the minds of all communities to help building an integrated and harmonious society, are instead misguiding the people, breeding hatred between the different communities dividing the population, through blatant display of their anti-Indian disposition.


We remember an ex-jude of the Jammu and Kashmir. High Court, Mukti Baha-u-Din, asserting in an affidavit,”.... That nearly forty two years back, India annexed the Jammu and Kashmir state by manipulation against the declared wishes of the people...”, helped Pakistani propaganda against India in the west immensely. One must wonder, why our government is failing to prosecute this anti-national element and is still paying pensions and other benefits to him?


Unwittingly, these Muslim leaders are not doing any good to their own community, through their seditious and antagonistic acts of defiance, but only alienating the very friendly Hindus to become anti-Muslims, eating away the fabric of the peace-loving Hindu society, much to the detriment of national interest and national integrity.


What had happened in Hubli, Naduatul or Moradabad are the blatant exposition of the Muslim psyche in Hindustan and damned failure of principle of secularism.


Since the present government has no intent or power to deal with these reactionary forces, because of their mollifying policy, the nationalist force cannot be expected to witness in silence this erosion of their culture, heritage, civilisation and total disintegration of the motherland, and therefore must act; and act before it is too late to save the country. This is the need of the day.


Nadwatul: For any country, there must not be any doubt, national security is of paramount importance. Sensitivity as to any particular religious affiliation is of no significance whatsoever when the question before the government is security of the country itself. The government is elected to govern the state and of the multifarious duties imposed upon them, security of the state is the most important one. No person, body or community should be above the law; and if a person, body of a minority community feels so shattered for intrusion by the Intelligence Branch of the State for crime-suspects, they must ensure that their places of worship or educational institutions are not used for harbouring the criminals and involved in subversie activities and acting detrimental to the interest of the state. The Intelligence Branch of the State carried out their rightful duties in raiding the premises at Nadwatul in Lucknow last November which was not only suspected, but in fact harboured, anti-social elements including the person of one Abu-Bakr of Rajdhani Express explosion reputation and others. Whether Principal Ali Miah is a Muslim scholar of high repute or an Indian Fakir with equal democratic right in a secular country; and whether he had any knowledge or not of harbouring anti-Indian agents in his college, is of no importance whatsoever when the issue is of national security. Apologising to Ali Miah by our leaders, instead of incriminating him for treason, for no wrong but commendable part in carrying out the sacred duty by our Intelligence Branch, thus pandering to the Muslim community, is a disgraceful act and exposition of base morale of the Chief Minister Mulayam Singh Jadab and the Central Minister C.K. Jaffar Sharif. These leaders, by their action as such became accomplices and thereby had not only forfeited their rights to be at the helm of the governments but should be tried for treason. The country is evidently not safe in their hands.


The correct course of action for the government must be to issue stern warnings to all irrespective that no one is above the law of the land and no institutions or places of worship either are immune from police action if they are desecrated by harbouring criminals and overtly engaged in subversive activities. If there is any one who does not like any such raid in their premises, he must be advised to refrain from any such anti-national activities. The Muslim Law Board or any other institutions, nurturing any immunity at the cost of national security, must be communicated this basic requirement in no uncertain terms or otherwise be prepared to pay a high price for action as such in the long run.


Kitu Rani Channamma Maidan, till recently was known as “Traffic Island Maidan”, since seven prominent roads meet at this place in the heart of the city of Hubli in Karnatak. The Muslim community was only given permission to say prayers there twice a year and a small structure was there to facilitate prayers. During 1992, when it was announced to unfurl the national flags in all public places, including Channamma Maidan, in sympathy with the programme to unfurl the flag in Lal Chalk of Srinagar, the Congress chief Shri Bangarappa pretended to play as a saviour of Muslims and deployed a huge force to stop flag-hoisting in the maidan to mollify the Muslims. How can anyone stop the compatriots hoist the national flag on Independence day or Republic day at a public place? Anything is possible for a corrupt hierarchy serving the cause of Islam. The determined youths were successful in hoisting the flag on 15 August 1994 briefly against all odds but at a great sacrifice of six precious fives.


The high-sounding institutions and the media are dubiously silent when 20 or more places of Hindu worship and the historic mosque of Sufi saint Noor Uddin in Chrar-i Shariff in India (the Hindus called him Nand Raja out of reverence) were destroyed between 8 and 11 May 1995 by the Pakistani Sunni mercenaries. Of the 22 terrorists killed in operation, 9 were definitely identified as Muslim mercenaries from North West Frontier province of Pakistan. Mast Gul of Afghanistan led the team of mercenaries to disturb peace in the area to frustrate the impending election in the Indian province of Jammu & Kashmir. Yet the perpetrators of the crime, the Muslims in Pakistan, Bangladesh and Hindustan are blaming the Hindustan government because the Hindu leaders are unwittingly and unwarrantedly apologetic for the crimes perpetrated by the Muslim terrorists aided by Pakistan. It is incomprehensible, why the Indian Government did not warn Pakistan for destruction of the Hindu temples and the Sufi shrine by her mercenaries. Why India is not claiming compensation from the government of Pakistan for the loss of lives and destruction of the Hindu places of worship?


It is curious, Gen. Krishna Rao (Ret), Governor of Kashmir, wasted no time to assure rebuilding the Sufi shrine at Chrar-E-Shariff and the Indian Prime Minister Rao made a declaration to grant 14 crores of rupees for building the shrine but made no mention whatsoever of what is going to happen towards rebuilding also the 20 Hindu places of worship destroyed and desecrated by the Pakistanis at the same time between 8 and 11 May, 1995. The tolerance of 85% of the Indians is taken to be granted in the land of the peace-loving Hindus under the corrupt pseudo-secular government.

vMass conversion to Christianity (The Organiser 5.2.1995):


Christian missionaries have now made Bastar, the biggest Vanavasi district in India, their target for conversion. Their first target was Raigarh district where the number of Vanavasis converted as Christians is not in thousands but in lakhs. Temptations and Intimidation have been the usual tactics of the Christian missionaries.... the Christian missionaries were tempting their victims that they would set up schools, hospitals and different developmental and welfare institutions and their (missionaries) funds were fatter than the State government’s exchequer. The Vanavasi MLA said that Christian missionaries had a free hand in destruction of Vanavasi culture, civilisation, their lifestyle and traditions. Shri Dilip Singh Joe Dev, BJP member of the Rajya Sabha claimed that the Christian missionaries were getting Rupees 1200 crores from abroad for conversion ... He said, by law, non-tribals could not purchase land of the tribals but Christian missionaries had purchased several thousand acres of land of the Vanavasis...”


Justice Niyogi’s findings on activities of Christian missionaries (Organiser 16 November 1994): The Madhya Pradesh Government instituted an Inquiry’ ‘Christian Missionaries activities in 1954’. The Inquiry was conducted by Dr. M.B. Niyogi, retired Justice, Nagpur High Court. The report was published in 1956 from Nagpur, part iv “Chapter Conclusions (findings)” reads,


On consideration of material before us we arrive at the following conclusions of fact:-


1. Since the Constitution of India came into force there has been an appreciable increase in the American personnel of the Missionary organisations operating in India. This increase is obviously due to the deliberate policy of the International Missionary Council to send evangelistic teams to areas of special opportunities opened to the gospel by the Constitutional provision of religious freedom in some of the newly independent nations, equipped with new resources for mass evangelism through the press, film, radio and television (page 27 and 31 of the Missionary Obligation of the Church 1952)


2. Enormous sums of foreign money flow into the country for Missionary work, comprising educational, medical and evangelistic activities, It was out of such funds received from abroad that in Surguja the Lutherans and other proselytising agencies were able to secure nearly 4,000 converts.


3. Conversions are mostly brought about by undue influence, misrepresentation etc. or in other words not by conviction but by various inducements offered for proselytization in various forms. Educational facilities such as free gifts of books and education are offered to secure conversion of minors in the primary and secondary schools under the control of the Missions. Money lending is one of the forms adopted as a mild form of pressure to induce proselytization. This is found very prominently in the case of Roman Catholic Missions operating in the hill tracts of Surguja, Raigrah, Mandla, etc, Cases where coercion was reported to have been used are generally of those converts who wish other members of the family to join their Christian parents or secure girls in marriage.


4. Missions are in some places used to serve extra-religious ends. In spite of assurance given by foreign and National Missionaries to authorities, instances of indirect political activities were brought to the notice of the Committee.


5. As conversion muddles the convert’s sense of unity and solidarity with his society, there is a danger of his loyalty to his country and State being undermined.


6. A vile propaganda against the religion of the majority community is being systematically and deliberately carried on so to create an apprehension of breach of public peace.


7. Evangelisation in India appears to be a part of the uniform world policy to revive Christendom for re-establishing western supremacy and is not prompted by spiritual motives. The objective is apparently to create Christian minority pockets with a view to disrupt the solidarity of the non-Christian societies, and the mass Conversions of a considerable section of Adivasis with this ulterior motive is frauht with danger to the security of the State.


8. Schools, hospitals and orphanages are used as a means to facilitate proselytization.


9. Tribals and Harijans are the special targets of aggressive evangelisation for the reason that there is no adequate provision of hospitals, schools, orphanages, and other social welfare services in the scheduled or specified areas.


10. The Government of Madhya Pradesh have throughout followed a policy of absolute neutrality and noninterference in matters concerning religion and allegation of discrimination against Christians and harassment of them by Government officials have not been established.


Such allegations have been part of the old established policy of the Missions to overawe local authority and to carry on propaganda in foreign countries (Organiser, November 16, 1994)