In the recently concluded election in Bharat, Christians have played a big role in defeating BJP. In this election of year 2004, vote for congress was in fact for Evangelical Christians, as congress party has been taken over by Evangelical Christians. Since Sonia has entered politics, Christians are playing a big role in Bharatiya politics from the background. When congress won election in Chattisgarh, a Roman Catholic person named Ajit Jogi was made chief minister of the state. In year 2004, when congress won election in Andhra Pradesh, then a Protestant Christian, Y S Rajasekhar Reddy has been made chief minister of Andhra Pradesh. In American elections, religions play a very large and important role. Americans are mostly Roman Catholics and influence in the election of President to a very large extent.
Once a US senator made a statement that ignited riots in India. It was not senator’s statement, but it was Evangelic Minister of a powerful Christian Group in USA. His name is Jerry Falwell. The Indian riots are covered on website
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/2323897.stm with Jerry Falwell's statement "Mohammed was a terrorist" being the reason.
Jerry churns out many graduates from his Madrasa type, Liberty University where he is the founder and Chancellor. He also broadcasts TV programs and openly makes degrading statements about Hinduism. Once he addressed his graduates about false religions with a Hindu deity picture in the background.
Most powerful TV evangelic minister is Pat Robertson, who even beat Bush Sr. in primary elections for presidency in three states. Pat's son is deputed for India affairs of his mission. Pat repeatedly calls Hinduism being a Demonic
religion on television. He has a very large audience and it is easy to create Demonic perception about Hinduism among his viewers. Pat finally lost election to Sr. Bush, but kept his campaign army intact with new name " Christian
Coalition". Christian Coalition is successful in now bringing Christian issues like abortion, Prayers in School etc. as a supreme issue for candidates of any election in USA. Republicans openly endorse Christian Coalition's agenda, while democrats have to make flexible statements to please many voters. Pat and Jerry enjoy welcome visits to white house and all republican Presidents follow their advice and meet their demands.
All kinds of denominations of Christians were involved in the Bharatiya election of year 2004 and have also influenced the outcome of election results. This was a high stake election for Christians due to Sonia factor. One cannot understand the overall impact of the followers of Christians and other Semitic religions in the election of year 2004. Christians determined the outcome of election result in southern Bharat, but more predominantly in Andhra Pradesh.
One wonders if Bharatiya people and congress supporters would have voted congress party if they knew that congress party had been taken over by Roman Catholic and other Christians, Evangelicals?
What is an Evangelical? Apparently people, who steal money from the poor people, hate guys and shove their religion at others. These people are who believe the Bible is the inspired word of God, Jesus is the way to heaven and sharing faith is essential. That does not tell much about how they’d vote, though. Or how they would govern, which is the point.
There is an underlying view that you cannot reason with someone if they believe their directives come straight from God. There is that risk, of course, but it is more a result of a personality type (rigid, simplistic, controlling) than a necessary by product of religion
Religion is a factor in any election all over the world, but it may or may not decide the outcome of the election. The issues related to Christians and converted Hindus into Christianity boost voter turn out in Bharatiya elections. Evangelical Christians and other religious groups are becoming part of any election held in Bharat. Followers of Semitic religions raise the issue of religion in Bharat in a misappropriate way and try to create wedge between communities at election time.
EMPRESS OF HINDUSTAN made by INDIAN NATIONAL CRISTIAN CONGRESS PARTY
Gladstone stands alone as the only man who was prime minister of the United Kingdom four times. Gladstone said this of ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH, “An Asian monarchy, nothing but one giddy height of DESPOTISM and one dead level of religious SUBSERVIENCE.” (Page 391. Biography by Roy Jenkins, pub Macmillan. ISBN: 0-333-60216-1). He had this to say of SONIA Khan’s ROMAN CATHOLIC: We should take note since Sonia is de facto EMPRESS OF HINDUSTAN. England will never consider a Catholic king or queen. Why should Bharat stick to one? We very much appreciate your efforts Soniaji in ASSISTING US TO MAKE ANOTHER ROMAN EMPIRE.We may now not hesitate to name Our Indian National congress Party as:
INDIAN NATIONAL CRISTIAN CONGRESS PARTY. With pranaam at THE LOTUS FEET OF:
1. THE C.B.C.I. OR (THE CATHOLIC BISHOP'S COUNCIL OF INDIA) SECULAR, AND OR
2. AT THE LOTUS FEET OF THE CHURCH OF ENGLAND'S AGENTS, SECULAR, AND OR
3. AT THE LOTUS FEET OF THE ANTOKIAN CHURCHES AGENTS, SECULAR, AND OR
4. AT THE LOTUS FEET OF THE WAHABITE SAUDI BASED MUHHEMMEDDENS' CHIEF AGENT. E. AHMED'S LOTUS FEET.
In One article in THE WALL STREET JOURNAL (REVIEW & OUTLOOK) titled Race in India wrote:
"When Sonia Gandhi and Manmoham Singh saw APJ Abdul Kalam this week for talks on appointing Mr. Singh to lead the Indian government, there wasn't a Hindu in sight. It was simply the Italian-born, Christian leader of the Congress Party that won elections meeting the Muslim president, and proposing a Sikh as prime minister". Under Sonia, all India Congress Committee general secretary is Oscar Fernandes. Under A P J Kalam, the president of India has S M Khan, Press Secretary to the President.
Bharat has 100 crore Indians and it is a shame that a bunch of clowns around her are making her a great heroine! It was a shame to witness a meeting of the Congressmen on 18th May 2004. The basic fact is that Pranab Mukherjee wants to be the PM, so if he does not get he does not mind if an Italian rules, but not Manmohan Singh!! Sharad Pawar, a man who left the Congress (I) on the foreign origin issue, was willing to support her to form the government! Any patriotic Bharatiya’s common sense fails to see logics in their actions!
Land of Hindus does not seem to have calibered Hindus to even serve under the top post chiefs who are not Hindus!! THEN THE BRITISH WERE ALL OVER INDIA. NOW, ONE CENTURY AND SIX DECADES LATER, IT IS ITALIAN- BORN SONIA KHAN, THE REGENT IN DELHI. HINDU HEAD CANNOT BE HELD HIGH. IT MUST BE KEPT DOWN, DOWN, AND DOWN.
We must face the reality that the clique behind Sonia Gandhi has made her "renounce" the PM position (which was never hers) only to bide time and gain control of the country. This could take the form of a judicial coup like the Emergency, or a Constitutional coup like an amendment to make her ruler for life. Demolishing the PM's office will be a step in that direction.
[We live, as the Chinese malediction goes, in exciting times! The whole world saw why a handful of Britishers could rule a subcontinent of Indians. The Congress Parliamentary Party (CPP) met in the Central Hall of Parliament - and, pray, which constituencies elected Mr. and Mrs. Roberto Vadra who sat in the front row? – and put on a spectacular display of the most obsequious servility and mawkish sycophancy.
Congress Members of Parliament lined up to grovel and abase themselves before Sonia Maino Gandhi as she sat in regal disdain, haughtily nodding at some especially expressive presentation of vassalage. Mani Shankar Aiyar and Renuka Choudhary led the maudlin tears, as they begged the mallika-e-jahan not to orphan them. Jairam Ramesh scaled the peak of unctuosity by clubbing Maino Gandhi with Gautama Buddha and Mahatma Gandhi. The spirit of Mussolini hovered in the air as the Congress (Indira) exposed for the entire world to see its fascisticization into the Congress (Italy).
Aptly so, for nothing in Italian law prevents Maino Gandhi as Indian PM also becoming the Italian PM (IFF, p.35).
If ordinary Indians get killed while on duty, it is an "occupational hazard"; if a Nehru-Gandhi gets killed, it a "sacrifice for the nation". An ordinary person needs no protection; the Nehru-Gandhis go around surrounded by protectors. If one of those protectors gets killed defending a Nehru-Gandhi, it was an "occupational hazard" for him; if a Nehru-Gandhi gets killed, it is a "sacrifice for the nation".
It is we natives ourselves begging a White to remember that it is her mission to civilize us. Not surprisingly, her fellow-Italian, the journalist Paolo Pontiniere, can proudly write of her that "Europeans revel in the pleasure of having one of their daughters bringing new hope to another continent" (May 17, 2004,
http://news.pacificnews.org/news/view_articlehtml?article_id=32dba964802779e3bb2b793b5d047b36). The Nehru-Gandhis have fed long enough off the fat of this land; they need to take their appetites elsewhere. But the Congress Party lackeys and their fellow-travelling Nehruvian secularists (who know their prosperity depends on these Nehru-Gandhis) are already working overtime, creating new myths for the edification of us natives. Sonia's grip at PMO. Pulak Chatterjee, a joint-secretary-level officer who was personal secretary to Sonia Gandhi is also among the new faces in the PMO.
And did you notice how Sonia Gandhi and her toadies, when speaking in Hindi, were obliged to say "secularism" in English? That's because there isn’t such a thing, and therefore no such word, in the Indian tradition they're now making such a fuss about! INDIA’S NEW CABINET:
Despicable traitors, lickspittles and anti Hindu MEN OF STRAW.
The comment is on them all. They are approved as loyal dogs of dynasty by the Woman from Italian “gutter”, SONIA Maino who has contempt for every native Swami, Rishi, Mahatma and Guru, who is there because of name Gandhi and who sees her son Rahul one day taking the oath of office as Prime Minister. She has no pedigree and not involvement with India’s freedom struggle, culture and language. She is adamant on converting the masses to Catholic Faith and would love to invite the POPE again to pay an OFFICIAL visit to Bharat to boost the flagging morale and spirit of the missionaries there. Next comes the Prime Minister. He happens to be a Sikh; a fact that the world media are making the most of by declaring that In India minorities can rise to the top. There is a serious deception in this statement. The word “minority” is being drummed into our ears to prepare the psychological ground for the next prime minister, again from a minority, either Sonia herself or a MUSLIM. We ought to tell them, “When you say minority, use the word NATIVE as prefix.” Sikh may be a minority but that is NATIVE minorities and Sonia and Abdul may be minorities, too, but they belong to FOREIGN minorities. We ourselves ought to be up on history to know that the native minorities have always been exposed to hammering, persecution and killing as in 1947 and later in 1984, not to overlook the native minority Hindu in South Kashmir. In the North the minority has been EXTERMINATED. Now compare their miserable plight with the “silver-spoon” minority like Catholic Sonia and GUN and DAGGER minority like the BULLYING Muslims. Analysis of Bharatiya election by Muslim world
Many Arab observers and analysts have closely watched India's recent general elections, hoping that the Bharatiya Janata Party-led ruling National Democratic Alliance (NDA) would be defeated. With the latter's surprising debacle in favour of the Indian National Congress-led alliance, they published many articles and surveys analyzing the event. The disturbing thing was that the great majority of analyses were based on delusive or hypothetical ideas that had no relationship to the reality of the Indian political scene. This clearly shows that many Arab intellectuals are still not familiar with India's political system, parties, and communities or with the issues most dominant in the country
Followers of Muslim religion show a despicable double standard that welcomes secularism only when it is in the benefit of their co-religionists in non-Muslim countries. No commentator in the Arab world shed light on Indians' sense of tolerance as represented by giving a decisive mandate in favour of Sonia Gandhi, an Italian-born Catholic Christian who only got Indian citizenship in 1984, despite all effort by the BJP to remind the electorate of her foreign origins. Commenting on the issue, a European observer said that Indians, by bringing Sonia Gandhi to power, have given Italian women what their own country has not given hem yet. He added sarcastically: "Perhaps Italians are awaiting a woman of Indian origins to rule them." Referring to Indians' preference of foreign Sonia over local Vajpayee, another observer said: "Indians are very fond of their local cuisine but nothing can stop them from accepting foreign cuisine."
What kind of Bharat politicians and public want:
Where free rein is given to followers of Semitic religions to convert Hindus into their religions, killing Hindu like in train in Godra and not even ever mentioning that in this incident Hindus were killed by minority Muslims, or displacing Hindus from Kashmir and never discussing their pitiable situation and trying to find out the solution of their problems, and keep putting blame on Hindus all the time as other religions are Avatars of virtues, falsifying the textbooks to downgrade Hindus and keep them demoralized all the time. Look at the conditions of Lahore's Hindu Community
http://www.pakcyber.com/pcp/newsviewsdetails.php?newsid=253 Wajahat to represent PMO in talks with J&K separatists
http://www.dailyexcelsior.com/web1/04may24/news.htm#6 NEW DELHI, May 23: Senior bureaucrat Wajahat Habibullah is likely to represent Prime Minister's Office in assisting the Center in parleys with the separatist groups from Jammu and Kashmir. Wajahat Habibullah (IAS, J&K: 1968) in an interview published under the title "Kashmir Conundrum" in The Times of India (Mumbai), May 20, 2002 stated:
"I had been appointed special commissioner, Anantnag...A large crowd...came to inform me that the Kashmiri Pundits were leaving Anantnag. My reply was that if they had decided to move, there was little the state government could do to stop them. The Pundits had reason to be afraid. They were a small minority. Every day tapes were being played from the mosques saying `Either you support us (militants) or else we kill you’...I fully acknowledge our failure..."Habibullah admits both the State's and his own (as the public servant directly responsible) failure to protect the Kasmiri Pundits and prevent their exodus.
Contrary to painting Hindus as intolerant, this statement conclusively proves the HINDU tolerance by their not retaliating against the Muslims in all the other states with Hindu majority! Compare this with the Muslim attitude! When the US Senator Jelly Powell made some derogatory comments about Prophet Mahmood in far away USA, the local Muslims in India indulged in riots and there were some Hindus dead! On mere rumours of burning the holy Quran (in Dehi) the Muslims burnt buses and indulged in riots in Kanpur.
In Bharat, one can become Bharatiya citizen; even get the post of Prime Minister or Rastrapati, if he or she wants to destroy the religion, culture. Language of Bharat, or even if she / he wants to destroy Bharat itself completely by breaking Bharat into many pieces. Sycophancy gets carried to its logical ends, starting with security pundits talking about lucidity in thinking and having right instincts. The ridiculous situation has arisen in the first place by permitting Sonia to get elected as MP, then permitting her to call herself the Chairperson of the CPP with authority to nominate the leader of CPP and thus making the present PM a dummy. We have 100 crore Indians and it is a shame that a bunch of clowns around her are making her a great heroine! It was a shame to witness a meeting of the Congressmen on 18th May 2004. The basic fact is that Pranab Mukherjee wants to be the PM, so if he does not get he does not mind if an Italian rules, but not Manmohan Singh!! Sharad Pawar, a man who left the Congress (I) on the foreign origin issue, was willing to support her to form the government! My common sense to fails to see logics in their actions.
Now that Sonia Gandhi has installed Dr Manmohan Singh as the new PM, what is her game plan? She has not given up power or politics; she has only given up the prime ministership. She continues to be the powerful Congress president and chairperson of the Congress Parliamentary Party (CPP). This is a new position created by her after changing the constitution of the party. It puts her in a higher position than Dr Manmohan Singh within the party, who is merely the leader of the CPP.
With Gandhi's decision to leave the gaddi for Dr Singh, the party president's position will become more powerful than that of even the prime minister. Doubts are being raised whether there will be two power centers. Dr Manmohan Singh, soon after coming out of Rashtrapati Bhavan with his appointment letter in hand, pointed out that the mandate was for Gandhi, and that she had graciously nominated him.
The Congress party too had made it obvious that Sonia Gandhi is the supreme commander by changing the party constitution and making her the chairperson of the Parliamentary Party. In fact, Dr Singh was nominated by Sonia and not elected by the CPP, as is the usual practice. The Congress is also making much about where she would sit in the Lok Sabha. Normally, the prime minister is the Leader of the House and sits in the seat marked number one. Number two is usually vacant and the senior-most minister sits in number three. When there is a Deputy Prime Minister, he occupies the seat number two. So it is going to be a piquant situation on the seating arrangement.
Sonia's eligibility to be an MP
Now the slogan is: rajmata. Why aren't the Congress questioning Sonia's eligibility to be an MP? Why aren't the Marxists questioning Sonia having power without responsibility? The opinion should be asked for and the issue settled once and for all that only Indian-born citizens can hold offices under the Constitution, including that of MP, Chairperson of CPP, Panchayat President, and Municipal Councilor. It is ridiculous to leave this absurd situation of Sonia being the Chairperson of CPP with the empowered authority to nominate a PM from her party and Manmohan as leader of the CPP. There cannot be one PM with accountability and another acting as a proxy or substitute or surrogate. It is unlikely this government will be blessed with a trouble-free initiation. With the Left at the wheels of decision-making, the opposition cannot afford to put off the fight for even a single day. The battle against national humiliation and the battle against the Left has to go hand in hand.
http://www.samachar.com/features/240504-features.html The only way to fix the problem of "parallel PM" (aka Sonia Gandhi) is to ensure that each mis-step of MM Singh's govt. is blamed on her door, because she is the one who is really calling the shots. Consistent focus on Sonia and not on Manmohan will ensure that she be held accountable for the misdeeds of her stooges in the Cabinet
Has Sonia Allegiance for Bharat
Oath of Allegiance
http://uscis.gov/graphics/services/natz/oath.htm The oath of allegiance is should be such:
"I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen; that I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I will bear arms on behalf of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform noncombatant service in the Armed Forces of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform work of national importance under civilian direction when required by the law; and that I take this obligation freely without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; so help me God."
In some cases, INS allows the oath to be taken without the clauses:
“ . . .that I will bear arms on behalf of the United States when required by law; that I will perform noncombatant service in the Armed Forces of the United States when required by law . . ."
Indian politics: issues and concerns
BY M.V.Kamath
http://www.samachar.com/features/270504-features.html The political system has virtually been taken over by criminals and bandits. What are the ways by which BJP and NDA allies can turn the system around and make it worthwhile for right-thinking individuals to join politics, not as a profession, but as a service, in the service of the Nation. Not the type of service, Lalu wants to render with fodder scam types and with proxy CMs.
It is patently foolish on the part of the Congress to try to foist Sonia Gandhi as India’s Prime Minister. She is not India’s choice as has been made out by some interested parties. She is the party’s choice and that does not automatically bestow on Sonia Gandhi the right to claim Prime Ministership even if it is conceded that the Congress happens to be the single largest party elected in the 2004 general elections.
How can anyone have any faith in a party, which depends so completely on one person? The myth that Sonia Gandhi represents the hearts of all Indians was devastatingly disproved the day word went round that she had accepted her party’s nomination of Prime Ministership when the market crashed to an extent no one ever imagined. According to one estimate the loss was to the extent of Rs. 1,25,00 crores.
So large and quick was the fall that market authorities first halted trading for one hour as the Sensex fell by over 550 points and tumbled still further by another 232 points when trading was resumed. Similarly, the National Stock Exchange plummeted to 1306 after losing 276 points. The market showed signs of recovery only after Sonia Gandhi emphatically announced that she was not going to accept the Prime Ministership.
What does that show? Does that show the country’s faith whether in Congress or Sonia Gandhi? The market is more worldly-wise than Sonia Gandhi’s sycophants. The catch word all along is “secularism” and the Congress has arrogated to itself that virtue. Since when has Congress been `secular? It has always played the caste game to perfection during every election. The line between communalism and casteism is very thin as anybody can tell. But for Congress to arrogate to itself secular virtues is a bit too much.
If the Congress was all that secular how come Jinnah got away with the Muslim League? Jinnah never accepted the Congress claim that it was secular insisting that it was primarily a Hindu party. The so-called Nationalist Muslims amounted to hardly anything. But even more sad is the fact that the Congress is depending upon the Communists to govern. Does Sonia Gandhi have any inkling of the Communist past? Does she know, for instance, that during the 1942 Quit India movement the Communists got hundreds of Congressmen arrested, jailed and tortured and some killed?
Does Sonia Gandhi know that the Communists were among the first to support the Two-Nation Theory and bolster the Muslim League? The Communists happily supported India’s partition. And if Sonia Gandhi now feels that the erstwhile enemies of her party are now her ardent supporters, she is welcome to her delusions. She thinks that the Communists are “secular” whatever that means. If secularism means abetting communalism, the Communists’ claim makes hilarious sense.
HINDUUNITY.ORG – PRESS RELEASE, MAY 27, 2004
PROTEST IN PUNE WAS HELD AGAINST VSNL & MUMBAI POLICE FOR BLOCKING ORDER OF HINDUUNITY.ORG WEBSITE
None of the violent Muslim Jihadi websites calling to conquer and kill Hindus in the name of Allah have seen such a ban. Various terrorist websites are still in operation today. Christian missionary websites calling for “harvesting Hindus” to Christianity operate freely and are accessible by all in India. Communist propaganda websites actively seeking to paint India red are allowed to prosper and Mumbai police along with their higher ups will not touch this issue. Imam Bukhari of Jama Masjid, one of the most notorious anti-nationals living on Indian soil has never been arrested nor told to exercise control in his speech. His open support for Osama Bin Laden during Sept 11th attacks of the Twin Towers in the U.S. is a shame to the democratic nation of India. Not a single eyebrow was lifted against him. What a shame!
The double standards against Hindus and the appeasement of minorities to the point of cutting off Hindu tongues is a travesty and a disgrace to the equal rights of Hindu citizens. We strongly urge all proud Hindus to make your voices heard or we will be silenced forever. Our rights as Hindus are sure to go if freedom to express ourselves is taken away. Freedom of speech is a basic human right that must be provided by any sound, well-balanced democratic government. The gag order on our website HinduUnity.org is just the beginning of the end of all rights of Hindu citizens in India.
Let the freedom loving citizens of India send a clear message to the government that we demand our right to freedom of speech. Freedom of thought and expression is the basis of democracy.
Chairman: www.HinduUnity.org
Many Congress Party members are Jaichands
Bharatiya courts failed in protecting the honour and security of Bharat. In this election, “Sanjhee Wirasat Trust” carried out covert advertising campaign intended to benefit congress party, claiming it to be in the interest of the public, but in fact such campaigns were against the NDA party. There many such Trusts or non-government organizations who carried out campaign against NDA party. “Sanjhee Wirasat Trust” is a notorious Trust, which have trustees like Kuldeep Naiyaar, Prabhas Joshi, Nirmala Despande and many others who have anti- Hindu views. These people are ready to be used by terrorists and fanatic Muslims of Bharat and Pakistan.
The article by Sheila Reddy in the Outlook magazine makes for very sick reading. It shows p-secs in their true colours: anti-nationals who have no sense of swa_bhima_n. They are behaving the way the communists behaved during the British colonial regime. For the communists and p-secs, swara_jyam has no meaning. They will have no problems selling the nation. With worms like these, we need no colonials or Italian-born people to rule Bharat.
Once Indira Gandhi won the election on the slogan “Garibi Hatao” but the Grabibi is still prevailing in Bharat, after about 35 years when the slogan was first raised.
Role of Anti- Hindu media in Election
The view that elections are a kind of think-in or gigantic, coast-to-coast town hall is media romanticism. Principally, it's an expression of media self-interest since newspapers; TV networks and the rest spend enormous amounts during election campaigns (many TV channels and the other networks have their own buses and correspondents) and need to justify the outlay by some higher cause than macho competitiveness, which is what it mostly is.
This doesn't mean that elections don't matter. It's enormously important that those in power can be brought to account periodically. The system gets aerated: even if it only means heaving out one set of rascals in order to replace them with another set of rascals; the new rascals will still be less rascally, for a time at least.
Nor does it mean that elections are only about choosing who will wear the captain's gold braid on the bridge of the Titanic. At times, media do give instructions and give biased news and write biased articles for influencing the public mood and for supporting a particular party.
If elections are as empty as this, is our democracy also empty? Not at all. Year in, year out, we express ourselves through interest groups, or through the inchoate but powerful force of public opinion as it makes itself felt every which way from letters to the editor to conversations over the backyard fence.
Those who don't vote will still be making an important political statement. In essence, they will be protesting the way our elections have become so empty of meaning, other than for the interchange of rascals. (Some, of course, will just be lazy.) About how to address that challenge, so that we both heave in a new set of rascals and give them directions on where to go, there is just one obvious point to make. But many elections are now a ritual with little greater effect upon our politics than the summertime, ceremonial changing of the guard on Parliament House. Real politics starts after the election.
The Indian English Media and English Reporters on India are Anti Hindu, anti - Bharat
It has become fashionable among english media people to indulge in Hindu bashing in the name of liberalism and secularism. Eversince BJP emerged as a force in national politics, and especially after Gujarat riots, anti-Hindu propagandas has intensified.
As if ignoring Hindu suffering is not enough, English media often portray them as perpetrators of the crime. Hindu refugees from Jammu an Kashmir are often portrayed as economic refugees if at all they get any mention, on the other hand victims of Godhara carnage are denounced as Hindu fundamentalists who deserve death. Subsequent Gujarat riots witnessed Media completely ignoring brutal killings of hundreds of Hindus.
When it comes to proving secular credentials, English media spares no instutions of the country. Credibility of institutions like Indian army and courts of justice has already suffered considerably because of such mindless criticism. It is childish to think this will affect only Sangh Parivar. It besmirches the entire Hindu community and hence India, which the world views it as a Hindu country. It will benefit none when international community puts India in the same league as Pakistan or Bangladesh, but unfortunately that is what precisely happening nowadays.
Therefore as inheritors of a great culture and tolerant religion, tolerant people request you not to indulge in the shortsighted policy of Hindu bashing for short term benefits.
What are the steps that BJP and other nationalist organizations should take to convert the Congress people to start thinking about the nation, beyond the blind adherence to the dynasty of the white people and appeasing of minorities? BJP and other patriotic organisations have a gigantic task ahead; the party should reach out to every village and explain the true nature of Congress politics and about the dynasty. And, set up a BJP unit in every village. Is BJP equal to the task?
India is a composite civilization - a nation extraordinarily unique as a cultural mosaic of people embracing a prodigious diversity of ethnic groups, religions, languages, customs, traditions, dress, manners, food habits, climatic conditions and natural resources, and yet presenting an underlying unity. And it has and will continue to stay that way with your help and co-operation! ========
