| MOBILE CLONING By PRAVEEN DALAL 15/05/2005 At 15:29 A WORK ANALYSING MOBILE CLONING.  PRAVEEN DALAL, CONSULTANT AND ADVOCATE, DELHI HIGH COURT, INDIA The concept of mobile cloning is not new though it has been exposed recently. This mobile cloning not only violates the “privacy rights” of the person owning the “original number” but equally is an offence under the Indian Penal Code, 1860. It amounts to “theft” within the meaning of IPC. It also results in the commission of contraventions and offences under the Information Technology Act, 2000 using information technology and its parallels . Thus, the remedy is both civil and criminal in nature. These remedies can be civil in the form of “compensation” for the wrong committed by cloning the mobile or it may be criminal in nature by virtue of IPC and IT Act. These remedies can be enforced only if the provisions of these two statutes are enforced in their true letter and spirit. An interesting aspect of this episode is the liability and/or contribution negligence of the company/institution providing these telephone services. If a customer of these mobile services has brought to the knowledge of the concerned service provider about these irregularities, then the company may found itself in trouble of defending both civil and criminal proceedings. The fine technicalities of IPC and IT Act are too cumbersome to be understood properly by these companies and they may face the music of criminal law if a proper case is registered against them. Thus, the service providers/companies must be very cautious about “customer’s complaints” and any casual approach, as is occasionally found, may prove troublesome for them.
Email:: pd37@rediffmail.com, perry4law@yaho.com URL:: http://praveen-dalal.blogspot.com/ >>Add a comment Lawyers and law students encounter normative pluralism every day of their lives, in legal and non-legal contexts. Yet legal pluralism is generally marginalised and viewed with scepticism in legal discourse. Perhaps the main reason for this is that for over 200 years Western legal theory has been dominated by conceptions of law that tend to be monist (one internally coherent legal system), statist (the state has a monopoly of law within its territory), and positivist (what is not created or recognised as law by the state is not law)... A second reason is that law is conceived of as what lawyers think it is rather than what those subject to it think it is; but lawyers`conceptions of law are derived from thier training and socialisation, from their claims to having a monopoly of certain kinds of knowledge and expertise, and these in turn are derived from or bolstered by underlying - largely statist`conceptions of law. Concepts such as "non-state law", "folk law", and"customary law" are generally associated with anthropology and sociology, even though academic lawyers have contibuted to their study as much as scholars from other disciplines... Just like maps, laws are ruled distortions or misreadings of social territories. They share these characteristics with poems...Though for different reasons, maps, poems and laws all distort social realities, traditions or territories, and all according to certain rules. Maps distort reality in order to establish orientation; poems distort reality to establish originality; and laws distort reality in order to establish exclusivity...with mobile regards,
|